Why Lean Is Important: From An Informed Client's Perspective

Today's post comes from Gerald Cronin of the Vivarium Operational Excellence (VOE) Network.

The VOE Network is a worldwide group of Lab Animal and Biomedical veterinarians and experts that have discovered and been successfully utilizing the Toyota Production System, or Lean,  to reduce valuable research costs while at the same time improve research quality and animal quality of life. 

From thier own website:

"Every modern industry and organization has been influenced by the operational advances of the Toyota Production System, the thinking that made Toyota the #1 auto manufacturer in the world.   Decades of research has proven that Toyota's systematic approach to improving operations has tangible long-term benefits to customer service, quality, productivity, adaptability and ultimately to reduce costs."

"The Biomedical Research community recognized these advances over a decade ago and thus began the adaptation of systematic continuous improvement techniques to the Lab Animal Industry.  Consistent with Toyota's philosophy of "sharing what they have learned from over 50 years of experimentation with the world", the Biomedical Research community understood that together, we could improve operations better, faster, cheaper if we shared our knowledge with each other." 

"With over a decade of experience, the VOE-Network was born to help the entire animal care community improve operations through members' experimentation, learning and sharing."

"The Vivarium Operational Excellence Network is a consortium of animal care institutions and companies committed to quality clinical and veterinary research driven by operational excellence.  We are a members-run organization that responds to the evolving learning needs of its members.  Learning spans the organizational spectrum from front-line technicians through Webinars, videos and Lean Belt certification to leadership skills gained from our Leadership Academy events and offerings.  We also look to industry for insights into the best ways to improve operations as well as ways to build a problem-solving culture."

Today's post:

I took my dog to a large Veterinary practice about a year ago and needed to use the restroom.  The restroom was tucked inside the clinical staff area, so I needed to navigate through some hallways to get to where I needed to be.  Along the way, I was able to see “behind the curtain” of this operation.  I was disturbed to see rooms full of medical supplies in random areas, cardboard boxes both opened and unopened piled on top of each other, medical devices stacked on top of unfolded towels and on top of unopened boxes, there was almost zero floorspace for staff to move around.  Random bottles that looked to contain some sort of medication were in random locations.  Then there was the office with piles of paperwork, computer terminals were poking through the mess, almost as if they were struggling for air.
The staff was walking from room to room and asking each other “have you seen the (X clinical item)?”  “Did you call Mrs McGillicuddy or was I supposed to”? “Sorry for the wait, Mr. Cronin, we’re really busy today” and “We will need to schedule your next appointment, we were hoping the machine would be ready today, but it’s in need of maintenance”.

I made it to the restroom and got to see more of the same on the way back. The trip made me pause, as I now questioned the quality of care my dog was about to receive.  I’m also thinking about what I was going to get billed for and why I need to come back. Piles of inventory and random clutter, medications that didn’t seem to belong there, medical devices mixed with cardboard boxes filled with supplies 3-boxes deep.  Machines that should be operational but are not. The red flags were popping up everywhere.  What am I paying for?  Can I trust this clinic?  Who can I trust here? Do they know what they are doing?

You can tell a lot from what you see in a clinic. Maybe some of the judgements are assumptions, but often they are pretty accurate. The telltale signs of disorganization, the questions staff ask each other, the delays, the missed information, the clusters of inventory that often contains expired materials; all give me the chills, no matter if I’m going for my annual physical or if I’m taking my dog to the Vet.   To me, the paying customer, they all tell a story of wasteful processes that I know are built into my bill.

I’ve been a Lean practitioner in healthcare for a few years, watching and helping clinical teams improve their care to the patient in the bed. If they can do more for the patient in a better, easier way, they are all over it.  I now work in the Veterinary world, and I have seen amazing transformations of quality of animal care and improvements to the Veterinary staff quality-of-life by focusing on improving small (sometimes tiny) process that support their daily work.  It’s so exciting to see folks enjoy the teeny challenges of improving their own work. Lousy processes are like “pebbles in your shoe”; workers agonize through the customs and clutter; given the chance, they would stop and remove the pebble to make life better.  Lean thinking does just that for workers, and the animals and their owners benefit exponentially. 

If you ever feel frustrated, rushed, frazzled, buried by complaints, or workers constantly asking questions looking for “common sense’ answers, the prescription may not be buried in a store room or office, but right here, sitting out in the open at no charge to you.  The world of Lean thinking is liberating, and Lean thinkers are eager to share their learnings and experiences with you.  We are here to help you; we’ve all been through the same frustrations and we found the prescription.  Take one small dose daily; you will be amazed at how your quality of life will improve. (My dog is OK by the way).

Gerry Cronin
gmcronin@mgh.harvard.edu
Vivarium Operational Excellence Network
www.voenetwork.com

The Law of Interconnected Waste

I have been reading (re-reading) Lean Daily Management for Healthcare by Brad White. I was very impressed by the book the first time through, and am learning even more this time. This excerpt from the book concerns the relationships between waste, value, your staff and financial rewards. Thank you Brad for permission to post this material.

This law states that all the process waste of an organization manifests itself in three ways: 

1. Reduced value to the customer 
2. Reduced satisfaction to the employee 
3. Reduced profit to the company 

This law offers some very powerful results from attacking waste. First, one of the best ways to increase value and quality is not to spend more money but rather to eliminate the waste and friction in your processes that sap value during production. Second, eliminating process waste will increase profits by reducing expenses. (There may very well be an increase in demand and quality. That, though, is more of a marketing issue. The key observation here is that it costs money to produce waste. Any reduction in that waste results in less money that is spent on producing it.) Third, reducing process waste will increase the happiness of employees. This final point is vitally important to the success of a Lean management system.

The Law of Interconnected Waste

Taken together, these three points reveal that there is natural alignment among employees, patients, and finances. We can leverage this natural alignment by tapping in to the current frustrations that our people have regarding the workplace. Thus, one of the best places to start when seeking to eliminate waste is to simply ask your staff. 

What frustrates you about your job? 

Any frustration they have about the daily operation of their job will invariably lead back to a process waste that impacts patients and drains resources. The management system you build will be able to take these raw frustrations, convert them into hard metrics, and then use the scientific PDSA problemsolving to drill down to the root cause. 

This is the secret to gaining employee buy-in. By tapping in to the simple fact that people prefer to do the job that they were hired to do, and that, all else being equal, they prefer to do it well as opposed to poorly, you can leverage their expertise to sniff out waste from the bottom up. Also, because your staff are constantly connected to the customers, they will naturally steer the organization back toward a customer-centric model because, like a horse that naturally follows the path since walking is easier, they prefer to be highly productive with lots of patient contact because that is why they entered the field in the first place.

                                       *****************************************




FYI: I am writing a book!

I am writing a book explaining the Lean mindset and processes from a veterinary perspective (the first of its kind!). In it, I will be emphasizing the similarities between the scientific methods of diagnosising a pet with a disease and scientific methods of using Lean to fix veterinary practice dis-ease. I am very excited to share this information, especially with my colleagues and profession. Stay tuned for updates .


Thank you for stopping by. Please tell your friends about this blog. Remember, comments are always welcome.

A Response To a Comment About My Post "Lean Self"

Last month, shortly after my blog on the “Lean Self”, my friend and mentor Mark Graban posted a comment to that blog. This was unusual.  Usually, Mark emails his questions and points of concern to me after receiving my final draft of the blog post, but before I publish the final, final draft. His questions sometimes come from sheer confusion about what it is ‘that I am really trying to say’, but many times it is his way of teaching in the Socratic (and Toyota) method. That is, rather than lecturing, asking the student a series of questions that lead the student to discovering the answer or reflecting deeper on the subject. Occasionally, I am not sure which it is.

I have decided to answer in another blog post, rather than a reply to the comment that may go unnoticed.

Mark comments:

Thanks for sharing this, Chip.

I agree that having a personal “true north” and understanding your own “current state” can be beneficial.  I don't quite see how to apply the idea of a “value stream” though. What is “value?” How does it flow? How do you see that connection in one’s personal life?

Mark

Here is my response.

Mark, thank you for your comments. Please forgive my tardiness in replying. I have been recovering from a little bit of surgery.

Your questions have caused me to re-evaluate my premise as regards extrapolating the Lean mindset to the “self.” As they should.

What is ‘value’ in this context?

Another way to arrive at an answer to this question is to ask, “What is really important to you in healthcare?” Or, “What is really important to you in a car?” For the “self” it would be, “What is really important to you in your life?” I think (hope!?) for most people it would be “contentment.” To be contented financially. To be content at work. To be content in our relationships.  To be content with ourselves. The Hebrew word “shalom” is generally translated as meaning “peace.” And it does, but it is the peace that comes from being “whole” (content spiritually, physically, emotionally, psychologically); not having excess or being destitute, but from having enough or being grateful with what you do have.

Part of the Lean definition of “value” is that the customer be willing to pay for it. If you are not willing to put a price on what you want, it doesn’t really hold any value. This holds true for the “self”, also. But, it doesn’t necessarily mean money. It means doing the hard work of honest self reflection, letting go of false assumptions, admitting mistakes, mending relationships, simplifying, budgeting, pushing back the ego, stepping out of the forest and,then, prioritizing and starting, somewhere, on a lifelong journey of improvement.

What is the “value stream’?

The Lean concept of the “value stream” requires, amongst other things, a provider, a customer and a “gemba” (the place where the work actually occurs). Unlike other applications of Lean where the provider and customer are separate entities, for the “self” they are the same, us. And the “gemba” is our hearts and minds.

The steps we go through in our hearts, minds and lives to get whatever value we get is the “value stream”. Whether that process results in contentment or “dis-ease” in a particular area of our life depends on how much muda (waste, i.e. faulty thinking, biases, rewritten history, skewed priorities, energy vampires, B**l S**t, etc.) is embedded. Graphically representing this thought process produces a “value stream map”

For example: I must be perfect →  I burned the turkey → I’m a bad cook → I’m a lousy wife → I’m a bad person.  Not good “flow.” Lots of bad processes and “trash.” What’s the value here?

Note that using 5 Why might take you back through this process. For example:

     Why are you a bad person?  Because, I am a lousy wife.

     Why are you a lousy wife? Because, I am a bad cook.

     Why are you a bad cook? Because, I burned the turkey AND I must be perfect!

BINGO!! A possible root cause. The false belief that “I must be perfect!”!

Now, to be able to map this current state value stream may not be easy and it may require the help of “stakeholders” (others who have our best interest at heart). And, just as in any other Lean application, finding the “waste” in order to produce a better future value stream will work best if our “stakeholders” are given access to our gemba and are present; if we are open, honest and communicative about what is going on inside of us and in our lives.

Thus, I think the Lean concepts of value, true North, gemba, current value stream, future value stream, A3 thinking, 5S, 5 Why and kaizen are just as valid working on improving ourselves as it is in improving manufacturing, service industries, healthcare, etc. for the customer- us!

Systems, Value, Flow and Respect

Part of the mindset of thinking Lean is seeing and understanding your practice as a collection of systems. Individually, they seem appropriate and functional. However, many times our different systems unintentionally “bump” into each other. When this happens, chaos and waste can result.

Consider this collection of systems found in veterinary practice:

A multi-doctor practice operates on a “base or percent of production” format to pay associate doctors. The base salary is low to encourage production. Very typical within our industry. However, there are some problems.

First, the paperless computer system is slow and the doctors are required to input not only their original medical notes, but also generate any necessary supplementary reports and summaries. 

Tech staff are not allowed to have anything to do with inputting any part of the medical records other than a simple history, primary complaint, weight, temp, pulse and respiratory rate (TPR). They are not permitted to enter any of the physical exam findings, test results, diagnoses (differential or definitive), treatment orders or client home instructions. 

It is estimated that for every minute spent by doctors seeing patients, at least one other minute is needed to perform this non-value adding work.

Appointments are capped at two 20-minute appointments per hour per doctor. By the time the client is checked in by the receptionist, escorted to the exam room by a tech, and subjective information entered into the (sometimes mind-numbingly slow) computer system, the doctor notified of the appointment and briefed, half, or more, of the 20-minute time has passed.

There are four exam rooms for two doctors seeing appointments. The doctors (and, therefore, the exams rooms) are appointed at the same times each hour, i.e. at the :00 mark and at the :40 mark.

Tech staff are not allowed to have anything to do with entering any part of the medical records other than a simple history, primary complaint, weight, temp, pulse and respiratory rate (TPR). They are not permitted to enter any of the physical exam findings, test results, diagnoses (differential or definitive), treatment orders or client home instructions.

Systems thinking. As one can probably figure out, with only 60 minutes in an hour and every 20-minute appointment actually consuming 40, you are 20 minutes behind after the first hour and that increases linearly each hour thereafter. 

The first slot each hour has a 20-minute break afterwards until the next appointment at the last 20 minutes of the hour. However, this appointment butts up against the next first appointment of the next hour. There is no 20-minute “safety” period here.

Over an eight-hour shift, one of two scenarios can result. 

First, this allows twelve of sixteen potential appointments to be professionally serviced appointments per shift. This may be fine provided the takt (basically, the rate of demand) is less than that. But, if you are growing, it means hiring more doctors, thus increased overhead. Hardly in line with “do more, with less resources, with higher quality, and less waste” motto of Lean.

Second, and much more realistic, is that the 16 scheduled appointments will be seen, but many, if not all, of them after the first hour will be seen late. And, the doctor and staff will need to stay almost three hour longer than their shift to finish everything required per appointment. (Or, if the practice is willing to forego 16 appointments per doctor shift, then they concede to only see twelve; a 25% cut in production!).

From an associate doctor’s perspective, who is paid mostly on production, this is a problem. It severely caps their ability to earn income. We talked, in one of the first blog posts, about systems and how workers can be at the mercy of systems in which they have no control.

The associate doctor has very limited control over the systems that affect his/her ability to earn, e.g. appointment systems (number of appointments/hour, who gets which appointments and so on). There are systems that affect the extent to which staff are trained to assist and facilitate, computer systems, HR/payroll systems (contracted production percentage, hours/weeks, time of shifts, days on surgery), etc. Systems are the domain of upper management or practice ownership.

Respect. One of the two main pillars of Toyota and Lean is "respect for people" (the other is continuous improvement). This situation, as described here, is disrespectful to doctors and veterinary technicians. It disrespects doctors by forcing them to spend so much time performing work other than what they are uniquely trained for and can earn from. But, it also disrespects the trained techs that are not being utilized (or trained) to their fullest capacity.

Lean promotes the idea that resources should only be used when they are needed, where they are needed and only in the amount needed. Anything else is waste (muda). Doctors are highly trained, unique resources. Their use should be very purposeful and intentional. The only person in a veterinary office who can diagnose and treat patients, i.e. generate fees, is the doctor. Any other "job" than these should be seriously reconsidered - and maybe assigned to somebody else.

Value. Remember, part of the Lean definition of “value” from the client’s point of view is something they want and are willing to pay for. How much do you think a client is willing to pay for a take home “Examination Report” or a  “Welcome to Our Practice” card handwritten by the doctor they saw? How much do you think they value being able to get in for an appointment and being seen promptly by a doctor, having their pet diagnosed correctly and promptly, and efficaciously treated?

Flow. As I have blogged about before, flow directly and profoundly affects value from the client's perspective. All of the above scenario negatively impact flow. So, value likewise suffers. And this is a form of disrespect to the client.

I spent about five years working for a major corporate veterinary practice. As a solo doctor, I was able to routinely see 35 to 40 patients each day, including six surgeries. One way I accomplished this was by instituting a system of forms and tech training that freed me from much of the medical records input without sacrificing accuracy or neglecting my responsibility for those records. 

I never had any issues with routine audits of my records by my directors and in one of my last years with the practice, was one of the top 20 producers in the entire national practice. 

The vast majority of my time was spent in the exam rooms and surgery doing the work I was uniquely qualified to perform, improving flow and creating value for my patients and clients. But, from my very first days on the job, my practice manager and I invested extensive time and effort in tech training and doctor/tech “choreography.” Staff members are one of the only practice assets that has the potential to appreciate and get better over time.

At left is the simple, quick form I used. I would draw it on the back of the “Permission to Treat” form generated by the front desk whenever a patient was seen so I wouldn't use a new sheet of paper each time.

I divided the sheet into six sections as shown. Each section corresponds to a specific part of a “SOAP” medical record as indicated.

I would write my notes, findings, lab results, differential diagnosis or tentative diagnosis, treatment orders, client instructions and follow ups in the appropriate sections. I then gave the form to the tech on the case for input into the electronic medical record (EMR) and headed off to the next patient with a different assistant. This typically consumed about ten minutes of the 30 minute slot. The tech would then present the treatment plan, collect and/or run any lab tests, give any injections, prepare take home medications, go over home instructions and set follow up appointments. They would also enter the line item fees for invoicing and escort the the client to the receptionist for check out. It was at this point that they would input the EMR, before starting all over with a new client and patient in a different room.

We typically scheduled six or seven 15-minute exams per every two hours of available time, This allowed some flexibility in the schedule as the techs and I “leap frogged” from appointment to appointment. In addition, we tried to only book three of the four exam rooms each hour. If the value stream of an appointment could not be completed within 30 minutes, we asked that pet be dropped off and techs in Treatment took over. I would come back to that patient later, when I had a break between exam rooms.

The understanding (and training, training, training!) was that the techs were to put everything I wrote on the form into the appropriate ”SOAP” section of the EMR. If there was other information or details they felt were important, then they should include that, also. They signed their initials at the bottom and put the form in a specified area on my desk for review and editing later in the day. The final responsibility for the medical records was mine and only mine, as it should be.

We also, at a later date, did away with a separate tech history and tech physical exam. The only history and exam that was important was the doctor’s. The newly available tech time was utilized to input the history, physical exam findings, treatment orders and home care instructions into the EMR in the exam room in real-time as I informed the client.

Note: This is also a good example of Standardized Work!

Tell me what you think. How does this impact your concepts of respect? How much of the daily work in a hospital should staff be allowed to do? Understanding that doctors are ultimately responsible for the medical records, are they the only individuals that can input them into the electronic medical records (EMR)?  What situations have you been involved with where you felt at the mercy of systems; a “catch-22?”  How was it resolved? How many clients actually value “the personal touches,” such as doctor-written welcome cards or examination summary reports vs being able to get their pet seen (and out!) in a timely and cost effective manner? One client out ten; one out of 100; 1000? Where do (would) you balance a conflict between flow and “that personal touch?”

Thanks for stopping by.

Einstein's Equation of Lean Relativity

No, not Albert Einstein! Moraito “Morey” Einstein, Albert’s third cousin, twice removed on his mother’s side.

Just kidding! However, this, in a simple equation, explains Lean.

“F” stands for Flow and “V” stands for Value from the client’s point of view.

Taiichi Ohno’s equation states:

                                      Capacity = Work + Waste

What this equation states is that there is always waste in our current state. When we remove some waste, we create a new current state, but there is still waste. We pursue perfection, but never achieve perfection.

If we substitute our total “Value Streams” for “Present Capacity” and “Flow” for “Work”, we get:

                                     Value Streams = Flow + Waste

Rewriting the equation gives us:

                                     Flow = Value Streams - Waste



This, then, is essentially what flow means. Flow is all the different processes (value streams) that occur in the management of a veterinary practice with as much waste removed as possible (and then continually improved).

Also, remember that Value is defined as that which a client desires (Dc) and is willing to pay for, that moves (Mp) the patient's condition toward the desired outcome and is performed correctly (without waste; W) the first time.

                                           V = Dc + Mp - W


Everything about Lean is about improving flow, because flow ultimately results in greater value. A3 problem solving, 5S projects, kanban, Just-In-Time (JIT) concepts, error proofing (jidoka), visual management, continuous improvement (kaizen), everything is aimed at pursuing the perfection of flow. We continually improve systems and processes in order to improve flow, and therefore, value. 5S organizes the hospital by removing clutter from work areas, organizing the areas so that they have only the needed equipment close to hand with a consistent place for everything and everything in its place. 5S also makes problems visible, and solving those problems allows us to improve flow.

For example, at our hospital we were constantly having to leave the exams rooms to find this or that item. Not good for flow! So, we went to each of the exam rooms and got rid of duplicate suture scissors, hemostats, tourniquets, etc. Then, the staff and I created a list of the supplies and instruments that we routinely use within the rooms. We chose a roll of tape, Vetrap, cotton swabs, gauze squares, clippers, a small supply of various syringes, a digital thermometer, a Nye tourniquet, a stethoscope, fecal loops, etc. We even put some blood tubes, Idexx spinners, and a bottle of heparin in each room to facilitate quick blood draws for lab tests. Finally, we organized the drawers so that they were the same in each exam room. Now, each room is the same, with the most used resources close at hand. In addition, we all now know, regardless of which room we’re in, that tape is in the right hand drawer and the tourniquet is in the left. There is less confusion. We don't have to think, “This is exam room 1, so the suture scissors are here...no, there...no, in that drawer.” There’s no more time spent searching for items. Also, doctors and/or staff can now quickly (visually) tell if the drawers are complete (standardized). If not, the problem is fixed right then so it doesn't continue to be a disruption. This improves flow, thus value.

Kanban and JIT improve resource utilization by creating a system that provides drugs, supplies, staff schedules and doctor’s time, to name a few, only when needed, where needed and in the amount needed. This frees up cash, space, staff and doctors to do more patient care which improves flow which equates with higher value. Visual management techniques, A3 (PDSA) thinking, and “5 Whys” root cause analysis allow problems to be easily seen and fixed at the root cause(s), again, in order to improve flow and value. Even kaizen, the concept of utilizing our ultimate resource, our staff, to identify and fix problems and remove waste (muda) from our value streams is for the purpose of perfecting flow.

Time is money. And, time spent on wasteful activities and processes is money lost. Everything in our hospital, even wasted items, has to be paid for through income from clients. Otherwise, it comes out of our pockets, our bottom line. Value from the client's perspective means not being charged higher fees in order to cover waste.


All of this, then, is contained in the equation F=V. Simple, right?

The different individual concepts and “tools” of Lean are relatively simple. The difficulty is conceptualizing how the different elements interrelate to create Lean, putting it into operation within your practice and, then sustaining it long enough to get positive results and change the organizational mindset to automatically think Lean. But, that is a different equation and a different blog!

For now, just remember, “it's all about da flow, ‘bout da flow, ‘bout da flow…!“

What are your thoughts? Let us know.

Flow (One Piece Flow)

In a Lean manufacturing setting, products are ideally “pulled” through the value stream, one piece at a time, continually. There might be times when batches greater than one are necessary. But, the goal with Lean is to find ways to reduce batch sizes in a way that improves flow without harming quality. Each step is ideally adding value, without waste, when the customer requests it (although there might be some “necessary waste.”) It is a similar process when performing a service for a client. 

Think of a value stream as a relay race. When the gun goes off (initiation of the value stream), each of the four runners advances one baton in a predetermined order (using standardized work). Each runner runs his leg of the race quickly and skillfully (adding value), and the hand-offs (pull) occur smoothly and without delay (waste), just at the right time (JIT) when the next runner signals his readiness (kanban). The result is, hopefully, a flawless (perfect) execution, in record time resulting in a first place medal (satisfied clients). The runners are ecstatic and proud (confident and engaged). The fans go wild (positive word of mouth advertising)!

This is opposed to “batch and queue” production where batches of product are produced at one time and then stored before going on to the next step. This results in much “hurry up and wait,” a lot of work in process (WIP) inventory, large amounts of warehousing space, and longer lead times.

For example, a product requires three steps to produce. Each step requires 10 minutes. In “batch and queue” mode, 10 units are produced at one time. The first step requires 10 units × 10 minutes = 100 minutes. The second step requires 10 units ×10 minutes = 100 minutes. The third step requires 10 units × 10 minutes = 100 minutes for the entire batch. However, the first unit is off the line in step 3 after 10 minutes. Therefore, it requires a total of 210 minutes (the lead time) for the first unit to be available to the consumer, and 300 minutes for the entire batch to be ready. This is not considering any waiting time between the batch processing steps (which tends to occur any time we have batching). 

Compare this with one-piece flow, where the first unit is through step 1 in 10 minutes. It then progresses straight through step 2 in 10 minutes and, finally, straight through step 3 in 10 minutes. The total elapsed time until the consumer receives his product is 30 minutes, plus any delays between steps. One-piece flow results in a savings of 180 minutes and is 85.7% faster.

In a multi-doctor hospital, four 10:00 am appointments arrive at the same time. Each client requires ten minutes to get the primary complaint, update the client information, pull the file, write the date and reason for the visit in the medical records, weigh the pet, and enter that data into the medical records.

The receptionist checks in all four clients before signaling to the techs that clients are ready to be seen.  This means that the first client is not seen until 40 minutes after his/her arrival.

In one-piece flow, the first client could be seen within ten minutes of arrival (and probably be checked out and on the way home before the fourth client gets into an exam room).

Or, techs draw all of the morning blood samples of hospitalized patients before centrifuging and running any of the tests. This keeps the doctor from being able to formulate any treatment orders as quickly as he could if blood samples were run as they were drawn.

Flow is the result of good value streams, JIT, kanban systems and standardized work. Flow equals value to the client. What’s also unintuitive is that reducing batch sizes can improve productivity. People often think working in batches in faster. Sometimes this is true, but not always. It depends on the work and the setting. We do know that working in batches creates a lot of waste -- sorting, moving, inspecting batches, logging them in computer systems, etc. -- work that wouldn’t be required if we had better flow. 

Improving flow in healthcare settings often requires changes to the process, such as the physical layout of a department or clinic. In the Lean mindset, we’d challenge ourselves to ask why we have batching or a particular office layout. “It’s always been that way” doesn’t mean it has to be that way in the future. If it is not adding value for the client or pet, it's probably muda and needs to be removed from the system.

Value

 

According to Lean, value is defined by three concepts. First, it is something that the client wants or needs and is willing to pay for. If the client brings in a pet, but is not willing to pay for vaccinations, they are obviously not valuable to the client, at least at this time, and we certainly would not perform that service. Secondly, it must move the care process forward in some, in terms of comfort, diagnosis, treatment, or education -- working toward restoring or maintaining health and wellness. The pet presented for vaccinations must be moved towards a more healthy condition by actually vaccinating the animal. And, thirdly, it must be performed correctly the first time (quality). Giving the wrong vaccines or inappropriate vaccines is of no value. Especially, if we have to go back a second time and vaccinate with the appropriate vaccines.

If a step is not value, it is waste. Lean organizations are focused, ultimately, on adding value from the client's point of view.  Improved efficiency, improved safety, reduced costs, better resource utilization, increased staff engagement, a culture of continuous improvement, and quality are all important aspects of Lean, but they are by-products of the methodologies Lean uses in order to provide value to the customer from the customer's point of view.

It’s important to note that adding value and being busy are not the same thing. Just because you are running around doing something, does not mean you are adding value. There is a lot of motion and activity involved in chaos, but the vast majority of it is not adding value to the patient or client.

A New Paradigm For Veterinary Practice Management

 

There is a new paradigm, a new methodology, with proven results over many different industries including human health care. The new model is the Toyota Production System (TPS), better known in the West as Lean, for its consistent ability to deliver both quality and value without the waste and frustration that we see in so many organizations.

Over the course of 70 years, Toyota has grown from being a small, domestic, truck manufacturer in a devastated post-war Japan to being the largest auto maker in the world, for a time in 2012, even surpassing America’s industrial revolution icon, Ford Motor Company. Additionally, they have been profitable in every one of those years except three. How has Toyota been able to accomplish such milestones? By relentlessly pursuing a strategy of operational excellence, which includes a leadership style and organizational culture that is very different than most companies.

Lean is not just a set of tools. Toyota’s own website describes their production system as being a combination of:

1. Technical tools and methods
2.  Management methods
3. Philosophy and mindsets 

Practiced together, this results in an organizational culture that develops people in the organization and sets up the organization for long-term success. Toyota also emphasizes that the main goals are improving flow (in the case of healthcare, providing the right care at the right place at the right time) and ensuring quality at the source. There is a foundation of safety being a top priority (for patients and employees) instead of being a separate program or initiative. 

            Toyota also described their “Toyota Way” management system as having two key pillars:

• Kaizen (continuous improvement) (http://www.leanvets.com/2016/02/kaizen.html)
• Respect for People 

Being respectful in the workplace is not just a matter of being nice. It means challenging people in a constructive way so they can grow and perform to the best of their ability. “Respect for people” is a phrase that is also sometimes expressed as “respect for humanity.” This means not just showing respect for all stakeholders (such as customers, employees, suppliers and the partners, the community), but also respecting our human nature. For example, Lean leaders understand that we have human limitations, such as making more errors when we get distracted or are physically or mentally exhausted. This drives us to error proof systems to help prevent common human errors, rather than just asking people to be careful.

In the Lean framework, operational excellence is based concepts, such as the following:

1. Value (http://www.leanvets.com/2016/02/value.html) is defined from the customer’s point of view.
2. Work relentlessly to reduce or eliminate waste (http://www.leanvets.com/2016/01/in-japanese-word-for-waste-is-muda.html).
3. Build a culture of continuous improvement.
4. Standardize work to improve flow.
5. Make problems visible and react quickly.
6. Understand problems and solve them at their root cause(s).
7. Demonstrate deep respect for workers and all stakeholders. 

Successful practices realize that long-term success comes from satisfied clients. Clients should truly feel we have their best interests at heart. Hopefully, they would choose our practice not necessarily because we are less expensive than another practice, but that they received value for the hard-earned money they spend with us. We are responsive to their desires, and we value their time as much as we value ours. Satisfied clients help resurrect the idea of positive, direct ”word of mouth" advertising.