A Different Kind Of Rounds: Lean Daily Management

As doctors and veterinary staff, we are well acquainted with the daily ritual of morning or change of shift medical rounds. This is the gathering of hospital staff and doctors to be updated on the current status of all of the patients in the hospital for treatment, and for the dissemination of new treatment orders by the doctors in charge. This is a form of standardized work. It gets everyone on the same page in a routine and timely manner.

Lean Daily Management (LDM) serves the same purpose, but for the operations and management side of the practice.



Each morning, leadership and management go to the gemba to meet with staff of a particular area of the practice to go over that area's board. What numbers are up (and why?) and what numbers are down (and why?). Or, better yet, do the Process Behavior Charts (PBC) of the data show any "signals" or is it all just "noise?" (see also Mark Graban's book "Measures of Success") What countermeasures should be tried? Any new kaizen ideas? What, if anything, can management do to support the staff? Any evidence that standardized work is not being followed?

Sidebar: One of the two Process Behavior Charts above is showing two signals. Can you identify which chart it is and what the signals are?

LDM helps support our progress through that big PDSA cycle called hoshin kanri or strategy deployment. Remember, part of the Act (/Adjust) phase of a successful PDSA cycle is to sustain the results (for now), write new standardized work, scale up if appropriate, and start teaching to the new standard. This brings a new current state, and the next target condition is identified, initiating a new PDSA cycle of improvement.

In the figure above, the wheel has been moved up the ramp (improvement) through A3 thinking and kaizen. But, there are forces in any system that want to undo that which has been accomplished. Some call it entropy; I think of it as organizational gravity. The function of standardized work is to counter those evil forces by stabilizing and sustaining the new current state.

The role of LDM is to sustain and stabilize ("nail down") standardized work as it is currently written. LDM functions as a "checks and balance" for standardized work, which acts as a wedge to help prevent organizational backsliding. LDM is the setting aside of time on a daily basis to monitor for this potential.

So, to recap, standardized work sustains the current state, and LDM sustains the current standardized work.

Lean Daily Management meetings should take 10 to 20 minutes per day. They are typically done in the mornings, however, they need to be a scheduled, daily priority for all involved. Choose the time that’s best for your practice and team.

All extraneous interruptions should be put on hold for the entirety of the time. During the meeting, a staff member from the department or area of the practice, such as the Hospital Care team, quickly reviews the metrics, status of any countermeasures, new problems that have come up, any cross training efforts, new and ongoing kaizen, etc. with management. The staff member that leads the meeting should rotate from amongst the entire team, so that everyone gets the opportunity to lead the conversation and learn.

As is the Lean perspective, management takes on a teaching and mentoring capacity; asking questions to stimulate A3 thinking, encouraging all efforts and practicing servant leadership.

So, Lean Daily Management accomplishes several things:

1. Gets management to the places where work occurs (go to gemba)
2.  Facilitates conversation and consensus building with staff

3.  Demonstrates management's commitment to the staff

4.  Monitors the metrics that support the True North statement and KPIs

5.  Allows time to encourage and appreciate kaizen efforts

6.  Sustains and audits standardized work
7.  Creates increased engagement of the workers

8.  Show respect for workers

Thanks for stopping by. Comments, questions, and suggestions always welcome.

Also, to answer the sidebar questions, the bottom PBC is showing a signal that needs to be investigated. The first signal is the data point above the upper process limit.The second signal is three or four of the last four data being closer to one of the process limit lines than the average. In the case above, the last five data points are closer to the lower process limit line than the average. In fact, it appears that we may be trending around an entirely new, lower average, which indicates that the whole system has changed somehow. Both of these conditions should have been recognized earlier than now, if they weren't. The next step is root cause analysis and formation of countermeasures, i.e. PDSA problem solving.

Lean Veterinary Scoreboards

In my last post, I discussed the difference between Management By Means (MBM) versus Management by Results (MBR). MBR means only focusing on the end result of the metric or KPI (and hoping the means of getting there are efficient and value-adding processes) or focusing on the processes that lead to that result, understanding that if all of the processes are behaving as designed and under control, the end result is a reasonable assumption. Too often with MBR, dollars is the only metric.

So, I wondered, could it be possible (theoretically speaking only!) to successfully manage a practice without actually measuring any money related metrics? And, what would that look like?

In other words, without tracking gross income, average client invoice, payroll expense as a percent of gross; any money metric?

What non-financial Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) could be used to assure the monetary goals are met? The trick is to be able to identify all (or many) of the processes that are components of the money goals and to assign a metric to adequately monitor those processes.

For example, Average Client Transaction is composed of gross income divided by the number of client visits. However, these two components are the result of other systems, such as fees, reminder efficacy, ease of appointments, number of incoming calls that result in a busy signal, hours of operation, client satisfaction, medical record audits (% of services performed that get invoiced) , etc.

Here is a list of some of the non-monetary metrics I came up with in order to manage a veterinary practice:

Quality 

• Door to Doc time 
• The time from the moment the client enters the practice to the time they see the doctor; a measure of flow and, therefore, value to the client.
• Number of unscheduled follow-ups
• The number patients needed to be seen a second ( or more) time in order to get resolution of the pet's condition. Notice this is not scheduled follow-ups for additional treatment, tests or monitoring.
• % visits scheduled for recall
• % recalls made
• Response to 1st reminder
• Response to 2nd reminder
• Response to 3rd reminder
• % pets current on RV (rabies vacs)
• # client surveys returned
• # of client referrals
• % staff completely cross trained
• % dogs current on HW (heartworm) prevention
• % pets current on flea prevention
• % blood sample hemolysed
• # of blood samples requiring redrawing
• % of medical rounds performed on time

Morale

• # idea (kaizen) cards submitted
• # idea (kaizen) cards/ staff
• # idea (kaizen) cards completed
• % idea (kaizen) cards completed

Safety

• # staff injuries / time period
• # pet injuries / time period
• # of adverse anesthesia events

Costs

• # of drugs or supplies found to be out of stock
• % blood sample hemolysed
• # of blood samples requiring redrawing

Some of these probably have sub-systems or sub-processes that might require monitoring and, thus, metrics of their own.

I am not proposing that no financial KPIs be watched. Veterinary practice is a business, after all. Some financial metrics are important and necessary. (However, they shouldn't all be financially focused, either.) Maybe we have not thought about the role that systems, processes, quality, waste, and flow plays in the money numbers; the Lean mindset. Maybe we should not worry as much about the end results and concentrate more on how we get there.

What metrics you decide to monitor is up to you and your staff. Remember, Lean is about making your practice the best "your" practice it can be, not a carbon copy of the practice down the road or on the other side of the country or, even, what a management guru says it should be in order to conform to some cookie cutter model. Your True North and your team (and some experimentation) will decide what metrics are important.

There would be high level, focus area metrics for leadership to monitor, sub-system metrics that managers would monitor and, still another layer (sub-sub-system) that frontline staff would create. These metrics are all aligned and make up your management scoreboards. Incidentally, this is an example of visual management.

Scoreboards

Note that these layers generally flow down from our True North statement (they're top down, but there's input from lower levels along the way). Leadership metrics arise from our practice's focus areas. They check the destiny or course of the ship. Are we heading in the right direction?

The middle and lower level metrics, created by the people responsible for that work (with some input from their leaders), check the systems and processes that make up the focus area (leadership) metrics. Are we getting to our destination with quality, safety, effectiveness and without waste?

This flow is, in essence, what Lean strategy deployment (hoshin kanri) is all about; getting the ideals of the practice down to the floor (gemba) and aligned throughout the practice. It is everyone pulling the same rope, from the same end, in the same direction and at the same time.

The routine of management and frontline staff huddling together in a safe, honest and trusting environment every morning to discuss the scoreboards is Lean Daily Management; a topic of later posting.

To Order, Click Here

Thanks for reading. Comments always welcome. Please, let your friends and colleagues know about the blog.

The Law of Interconnected Waste

I have been reading (re-reading) Lean Daily Management for Healthcare by Brad White. I was very impressed by the book the first time through, and am learning even more this time. This excerpt from the book concerns the relationships between waste, value, your staff and financial rewards. Thank you Brad for permission to post this material.

This law states that all the process waste of an organization manifests itself in three ways: 

1. Reduced value to the customer 
2. Reduced satisfaction to the employee 
3. Reduced profit to the company 

This law offers some very powerful results from attacking waste. First, one of the best ways to increase value and quality is not to spend more money but rather to eliminate the waste and friction in your processes that sap value during production. Second, eliminating process waste will increase profits by reducing expenses. (There may very well be an increase in demand and quality. That, though, is more of a marketing issue. The key observation here is that it costs money to produce waste. Any reduction in that waste results in less money that is spent on producing it.) Third, reducing process waste will increase the happiness of employees. This final point is vitally important to the success of a Lean management system.

The Law of Interconnected Waste

Taken together, these three points reveal that there is natural alignment among employees, patients, and finances. We can leverage this natural alignment by tapping in to the current frustrations that our people have regarding the workplace. Thus, one of the best places to start when seeking to eliminate waste is to simply ask your staff. 

What frustrates you about your job? 

Any frustration they have about the daily operation of their job will invariably lead back to a process waste that impacts patients and drains resources. The management system you build will be able to take these raw frustrations, convert them into hard metrics, and then use the scientific PDSA problemsolving to drill down to the root cause. 

This is the secret to gaining employee buy-in. By tapping in to the simple fact that people prefer to do the job that they were hired to do, and that, all else being equal, they prefer to do it well as opposed to poorly, you can leverage their expertise to sniff out waste from the bottom up. Also, because your staff are constantly connected to the customers, they will naturally steer the organization back toward a customer-centric model because, like a horse that naturally follows the path since walking is easier, they prefer to be highly productive with lots of patient contact because that is why they entered the field in the first place.

                                       *****************************************




FYI: I am writing a book!

I am writing a book explaining the Lean mindset and processes from a veterinary perspective (the first of its kind!). In it, I will be emphasizing the similarities between the scientific methods of diagnosising a pet with a disease and scientific methods of using Lean to fix veterinary practice dis-ease. I am very excited to share this information, especially with my colleagues and profession. Stay tuned for updates .


Thank you for stopping by. Please tell your friends about this blog. Remember, comments are always welcome.